<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- Only pages that are actually open to search engines (2026-07-27).
     terms, privacy and refund were listed here while also carrying
     <meta name="robots" content="noindex"> in their own markup, which told
     Google two opposite things about the same URLs. Google obeys the noindex,
     so nothing was mis-indexed, but Search Console reports the contradiction
     as an error and the sitemap stops being a clean signal. Legal pages do not
     belong in search results anyway. -->
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9">
  <url>
    <loc>https://dreamjourney.travel/</loc>
    <priority>1.0</priority>
  </url>
  <!-- /cusco joined the sitemap on 2026-07-30, in the same deploy that removed
       its noindex and added the landing links. The order matters: a URL listed
       here while still carrying noindex is the exact contradiction the note at
       the top of this file describes, and a URL that no page links to is an
       orphan the sitemap alone cannot rescue. -->
  <url>
    <loc>https://dreamjourney.travel/cusco</loc>
    <lastmod>2026-07-30</lastmod>
    <priority>0.8</priority>
  </url>
  <!-- /cancun joined on 2026-07-31, in the same deploy that removed its own
       noindex and set PUBLISHED in pages/cancun.tsx. Same order, same reason as
       /cusco above. scripts/audit/audit.mjs now checks the two against each
       other on every run: a URL listed here while still carrying a noindex
       fails, and so does a URL open to indexing but missing from this file. -->
  <url>
    <loc>https://dreamjourney.travel/cancun</loc>
    <lastmod>2026-07-31</lastmod>
    <priority>0.8</priority>
  </url>
</urlset>
